Another Acre and Another Goat
By Amos Gvirtz
Amos Gvirtz is a nonviolent peace
activist and a passionate proponent of justice for the Palestinians
throughout Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories. He is one
of the founders of ICAHD. Amos Gvirtz lives in Kibbutz Shefayim near
Tel Aviv and can be reached by email at amosg@shefayim.org.il
During my childhood in the 1950s I still heard echoes of the
argument (from pre-state days) between the Zionist Labor Movement and
the Zionist Right. The Labor Movement people criticized the Zionist
Right for declaring the intention of the Zionist Movement to inherit
the Land of Israel. They argued that these declarations would arouse
Arab resistance to the Zionist enterprise. In their view, the
state-in-the-making should be built quietly, according to the slogan
"another acre and another goat."
When one sees and hears what's going on in the occupied territories
today, one can only conclude that the same approach characterizes our
own times as well, together with the same old argument between quiet
action and declared intentions. Except that today, instead of buying
land, it is taken by force. Along with the building of settlements,
Palestinians are expelled and their houses destroyed. All these things
are done on a small scale – after all, our entire existence
depends on the international community that supports us. If Israel were
to act on a larger scale, that support would decline. Only in the
context of a war does Israel allow itself massive action, as was the
case in the "Cast Lead" operation in Gaza, where the IDF killed 1400
people and destroyed more than 4000 homes!
Whoever follows these things in the news, hears from time to time about
small land confiscations near settlements, for security needs or for
paving a road. The very existence of the separation barrier ("the
wall") serves as a means for stealing land. After the separation
barrier is built, as the years go by, additional lands are taken from
their Palestinian owners on the grounds that they are not cultivated
– even if there is no possibility of cultivating them since many
landowners are denied permits to cross the barrier and work their
lands. And if the IDF doesn't confiscate the land, then land-greedy
settlers attack Palestinian farmers. The IDF protects the attackers and
expels the farmers. After three years when Palestinians are unable to
or do not dare to enter their lands, the lands are officially declared
"state lands" because they have not been
cultivated.
It's the same story with home demolitions. First they confiscated the
granting of building permits from Palestinians by disenfranchising the
work of the Palestinian building and planning committees. After that
the Israeli authorities practically stopped granting building permits
to Palestinians. And then, when thousands of Palestinian families had
no choice but to build without permits, they were issued demolition
orders. The demolitions are carried out little by little over time, so
that the media loses
interest.
The policy of expulsions works in a similar way. Permanent residency is
denied to people who marry local Palestinian residents, even if they
live in "Area A" (the Palestinian cities) which are under the full
control of the Palestinian Authority. Even after decades of married
life, these non-resident spouses are required to go abroad every three
months and return to their families as tourists. Sometimes they are not
allowed to return at all. It seems that the State of Israel wants these
families to leave their homes in the occupied territories in the wake
of the spouses who are denied
residency.
And so it seems that we have returned to pre-state days. Israel has
eradicated its borders with the occupied territories, ignores
international law and international norms, and systematically acts to
annex the West Bank and the Golan Heights. For this purpose the State
steals lands, builds settlements, destroys houses and expels
people.
In the 1980s the country was up in arms: The racist Rabbi Meir Kahane
succeeded in becoming a Knesset Member! He announced in a loud voice
what Israel was doing little by little. The shock was great.
Legislation against racist incitement was passed – not, of
course, against racist actions – and Kahane's party was declared
illegal. If a law against racist actions had been legislated, we would
be in danger of placing Israeli governments outside the
law.
On the eve of Holocaust Day, the headline in the Israeli newspaper
"Ha'aretz" informed us of a military order issued by the Head of the
Army Central Command that would enable the expulsion of tens of
thousands of Palestinians from the West Bank. At this point I will take
the risk of saying something that is prohibited among us: that's how it
started in Germany. They spoke about the transfer of Jews from Europe.
Only when they realized that this was impossible did they decide on the
"final
solution."
These days Knesset Members are busy initiating legislation that will
prohibit commemorating the "Nakba" (the Palestinian catastrophe) of
1948… The only thing lacking is the initiation of legislation
that would prohibit the continuation of the slow and ongoing
implementation of all the components of the
"Nakba."